How to Become a Dangerous Person
How do you become “dangerous”? Writer and Portland-based podcaster Nancy Rommelmann would have thought she was the last person to answer that question — until she publicly dared to raise some questions about the #MeToo movement. Then her life suddenly changed and she became public enemy number one. She tells her astonishing story — what happened and why — in this compelling video.
Ms. Rommelmann currently lives in _____________________________.
Eugene, OregonPortland, OregonPortland, MaineSeattle, WashingtonWhen did Ms. Rommelmann start her #MeNeither YouTube podcast?
September, 2018October, 2018November, 2018December, 2018Ms. Rommelmann believes that we are better off judging any claim of harassment, like any other claim, on its own merits.
TrueFalseWhen Ms. Rommelmann offered to speak to her critics, how many of them took her up on her offer?
328around 1000In the U.S., every citizen has the equal right to __________________________________.
vandalize a business that is dangerous to its employeesslander and to make fraudulent claims against a business that they don’t likevoice his or her opinion, and to express these opinions in a public forumAll of the above
- Want to become a “dangerous person”? Simply exercise your free speech to argue against leftist narratives.
In an increasingly more common example of conservative individuals being punished for exercising their free speech, podcaster and author Nancy Rommelmann and her husband became targets of a vicious boycott and smear campaign after Rommelmann warned against the excesses of the #MeToo movement on her YouTube podcast entitled #MeNeither.
View source#MeNeither — “an almost-weekly conversation about the cultural issues of the day, and an attempt to create a space where people can find ways to think out loud through uncomfortable topics” — stands against modern feminism and identity politics.
View sourceWhile Rommelmann stresses that sexual assault and harassment are of course a real problem, her show questions the idea that any charge must be believed without question.
View sourceRelated reading: “Op-Ed: Outrage Culture Is Out of Control” – Nancy Rommelmann
View source- Attempts to silence conservative views increasingly include smear campaigns that can have real impact on people’s lives.
Nancy Rommelmann and her husband became the targets of a boycott and smear campaign after a former employee of her husband’s coffee business heard Rommelmann’s warn against the excesses of the #MeToo movement on her podcast #MeNeither.
View sourceThe ex-employee claimed Rommelmann’s views were “vile, dangerous, and extremely misguided.” The email claimed that her show somehow made her husband’s business an unsafe place to work.
View sourceOn surviving a social media attack, Rommelmann says, “Do not try to have rational conversations with the masses. They did not know you before this started and have no reason to trust you now.”
View source- Thanks to the outrage mob, expressing conservative views in public forums has become a risk to anyone who owns a business.
In response to the smears against Nancy Rommelmann for pushing back against the excesses of the #MeToo movement, a college-age girl stormed into one of her husband’s cafes screaming that the baristas were in danger and that their working at the cafe posed a threat to the community.
View sourceArticles supporting the outrage mob quickly appeared online.
View sourceThe Rommelmanns’ company lost a quarter of its employees within days.
View sourceWholesale customers cancelled large accounts, afraid they’d be caught in the #MeToo crossfire.
View sourceThe 15-year-old business was in danger of closing — all because Rommelmann questioned the #MeToo movement online.
View source- Many who claim to be “offended” by someone’s speech are both hypocritical and uninformed.
Many of those who claimed to have been offended by Nancy Rommelmann’s podcast questioning the #MeToo movement had not seen the podcast. One woman wrote, “I clicked, paused, down voted, then reported on YouTube that it violates community guidelines: hateful… I didn’t listen but it’s one way to make [it] go away.”
View sourceRommelmann’s podcast also called out the anti-Semitism of leaders of the Women’s March, but these issues were never addressed by the mob.
View sourceWATCH: “Does Free Speech Offend You?” – Greg Lukianoff
View source- The outrage mob values feelings over facts—that’s why it’s impossible to reason with it.
Nancy Rommelmann, who became the target of a smear and boycott campaign for questioning the #MeToo movement, describes the outrage mob that organized against her: “While those engaging in these fights may be a tiny but vocal minority, they are nevertheless a contagion. They value feelings over facts. They reject direct confrontation, preferring to scrap it out online or letting the media do their work for them.”
View sourceWhen your “15 minutes of hate” has begun, “reason has left the room,” says Rommelmann. The leftist mob isn’t interested in the truth.
View sourceRommelmann has invited her critics to speak with her; she has had only one taker
View sourceRelated video: “Control the Words, Control the Culture” – Michael Knowles
View source
You are looking at a dangerous person. You may feel unsafe—even threatened—by my very existence. What is this power I possess?
It’s called…“free speech.”
While I knew it was always there, I recently discovered its true value. Here is my story. It could easily be yours.
I’m a journalist, an author, and a podcaster. I live in Portland, Oregon. My husband owns a few local coffee shops and a small coffee roasting business called Ristretto Roasters.
In December 2018, I started a YouTube podcast entitled #MeNeither. The show’s “about” page reads, “#MeNeither is an almost-weekly conversation about the cultural issues of the day, and an attempt to create a space where people can find ways to think out loud through uncomfortable topics.”
One of those topics is the #MeToo movement and what I see as some of its excesses, including celebrities who exploit #MeToo for personal gain. Sexual assault and harassment are real, but the idea that any charge any woman—or man—brings must be believed without question…where’s the logic in that? I believe we are better off judging any claim of harassment, like any other claim, on its own merits. This, I would learn, is not a popular position.
It turned out, one of the people tuning in to my new show was a former employee of my husband’s coffee business. She claimed my views were “vile, dangerous, and extremely misguided” and, in an email to the press, claimed my opinions created a “demoralizing and hostile environment for employees.”
Why would the opinions of the wife of the boss demoralize an employee? No one bothered to ask that question. That I appeared to be on the wrong side of the #MeToo debate was all people needed to know.
By the time you could say “Twitter,” a social media mob formed to say they would never spend another penny at my husband’s business.
A college-age girl stormed into one of the cafes screaming, variously, that the baristas were in danger and that their working at the cafe posed a threat to the community.
Employees previously secure in their jobs grew jittery and quit. One suggested that my husband sell the company and that I offer a public apology before it was too late.
This all happened within the first 48 hours.
As the outrage grew, local businesses that make up a big part of my husband’s base cut and run. Wholesale customers cancelled large accounts, afraid they’d be caught in the #MeToo crossfire. Staff now worried that they’d lose their jobs (and health insurance) if Ristretto were forced to close; that I—a person with whom they’d heretofore had a perfectly congenial relationship—might, in fact, be a secret monster, a rape culture apologist.
Many of those who claimed to have been offended had not seen the podcast. One woman wrote, “I clicked, down-voted, then reported on YouTube that it violates community guidelines: hateful… I didn’t listen, but it’s one way to make that [expletive] go away.”
This kind of uninformed, virtual attack strikes me as childish—the behavior of a toddler whose tantrum brings a dinner party to a halt until it’s placated with the attention it seeks.
I invited my critics to speak with me—the whole point of #MeNeither is to provoke discussion. No one took me up on my offer. It was evidently easier for so-called feminists to tell my husband to leave his wife or lose his business, for some random dude on Facebook to send me the message, “You are scum. Rot in hell you dirty...”—just use your imagination—than to honestly confront me.
I can’t help but think that those who engage in this kind of behavior are steering themselves into perpetually unhappy waters, that they live in fear that everyone and everything is out to get them, so therefore they must strike first. Or are they addicted to the feeling that what they are doing is righteous? Not considering intolerance in the name of tolerance is a frightening contradiction and solves nothing. Or maybe they think they are making progress. But if this is progress, one might reasonably ask, for whom? And to what end? It’s also contrary to what is most fundamental to America: that every citizen has the equal right to voice his or her opinion, and to express these opinions in a public forum.
My story is one of many, another cautionary tale for those who get pulled into the culture wars. I understand why most people want to stay out of it. It’s scary to fight for liberty and against a mob. The whole thing is exhausting.
I have repeatedly been asked, usually in “you should have known better” tones, if I am going to stop having nuanced conversations about sensitive subjects. The answer is absolutely not.
And if that makes you feel unsafe? Too bad.
I’m Nancy Rommelmann, journalist and author, for Prager University.
Stay up to date on our latest releases
PragerU is changing the minds of millions worldwide. Help us keep our videos FREE!
Help support our mission
To make a donation over the phone, call (833) PragerU
At $35 or more you’ll be a PragerUnited Member
- Free merch every quarter
- Insider updates
- Free Annual Membership Sticker
Prager University is a 501(c)(3) nonprofit, Tax ID: 27-1763901. Your contribution is fully tax-deductible in the USA.